{"id":15715,"date":"2017-04-20T09:09:10","date_gmt":"2017-04-19T23:09:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/?p=15715"},"modified":"2017-04-20T09:13:02","modified_gmt":"2017-04-19T23:13:02","slug":"policy-and-advocacy-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Policy and Advocacy update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Apr 2017<\/p>\n<p>We are continuing to work through the list of Institute policies that need updating, with ongoing consultation with members to ensure we are dealing with the issues that matter most to members and effectively communicating our messages to governments and the public. New policies can be developed at the instigation of the chapters, national committees and National Council.<\/p>\n<p>Since our last update, we have also advocated at a state and territory level on several issues:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#NSW\">NSW<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#Tas\">Tas<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#Vic\">Vic<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a id=\"NSW\"><\/a>NEW SOUTH WALES<\/p>\n<p><strong>NSW Planning Act amendments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The former New South Wales Planning Minister, Rob Stokes, launched draft amendments at the start of the year to the <em>Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979<\/em>. Many of the amendments were first proposed as new elements of the planning system in the ill-fated Planning Bill, which was rejected by the NSW Upper House in 2013. They included:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Protocols for councils\u2019 engagement with communities<br \/>\n\u2022&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Strategic planning instruments at the local level to bridge the gap between the Greater Sydney Commission\u2019s draft District Plans and statutory local environmental plans<br \/>\n\u2022&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;and, greater standardisation of local government development control plans (architects can help to make these more visually engaging documents).<\/p>\n<p>The most far-reaching change affecting architects is the proposal to include \u2018good design in the built environment\u2019 as a new objective of the Act. The NSW Chapter has applauded this very welcome innovation, as it places good design alongside other economic and social objectives. However, there is one caveat, with the chapter arguing that the wording should be changed to \u2018good design of the built environment\u2019, as the objective needs to encompass the whole of the built environment, including residential and commercial development, infrastructure, streets, parks, street trees, etc. The chapter says this would encourage proponents and consent authorities to look beyond the individual development proposal and to also consider its potential design impact on the existing and planned precinct as a whole. It says design of the spaces between individual buildings is particularly important. The chapter has also recommended the preparation of guideline documents associated with the amended Act or its regulation to clearly define \u2018built environment\u2019 and \u2018good design\u2019 from a visual, precinct-based perspective.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Greater Sydney draft District Plans<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Towards the end of 2016 the Greater Sydney Commission, which had then been in existence for less than a year, released six draft District Plans for public appraisal. These provide a link between the overarching metropolitan plan at one end of the planning spectrum and local councils\u2019 local environmental plans at the other. The commission also released its three city concepts:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Western City, based around the proposed Western Sydney Airport at Badgerys Creek<br \/>\n\u2022&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Central City, based around Parramatta<br \/>\n\u2022&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;and, Eastern City, based on the global arc of economic activity from Macquarie Park in the north to Sydney Airport in the south.<\/p>\n<p>The NSW Chapter generally supports the commission\u2019s work as a game changer for the planning of the Greater Sydney region as a whole. However, it believes the draft District Plans are too long; they should explain principles clearly enough to inform the local plans; clearer references are needed to the excellent research material in the extensive background reports; and a number of governance issues need to be addressed, particularly the role of mayors in district planning. Nevertheless, the chapter regards the draft District Plans as a very good start, which demonstrate real progress in the NSW planning system, as long as they are supported by a comprehensive and responsive transport master plan, and are developed in sufficient detail to provide clear guidance for local plans.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<br \/>\n<a id=\"Tas\"><\/a>TASMANIA<\/p>\n<p><strong>Building documentation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Tasmanian Practice Committee has provided a formal submission to the state\u2019s Department of Justice in relation to the minimum level of information that should be provided on building approval documents for class 2 to 9 buildings. The Department has the Director\u2019s Specified List \u2013 Schedule 1, which outlines the minimum requirements for design documentation for class 1 and class 10 buildings in Tasmania, and is considering expanding this approach to include class 2 to 9 buildings. Members of the Practice Committee have offered general support for the document as a guide, with some suggested clarification and amendments. The committee members are also arguing against the document being used as a checklist for use by building certifiers. The committee hopes to continue negotiations with the department over the coming months.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<br \/>\n<a id=\"Vic\"><\/a>VICTORIA<\/p>\n<p><strong>Better Apartments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Victorian Chapter made two further submissions to the Director of Planning Projects (Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning) in March and April, as well as attending all the reference group meetings; this was in addition to an extensive, formal submission in September. The <em>Better Apartments Design Standards<\/em> were implemented into the Victoria Planning Provisions and all planning schemes via Amendment VC136 on 13 April 2017. However, the supporting tools and process won\u2019t be introduced until May, including apartment design guidelines and details on a design advisory service for more complex developments. While the chapter supports apartment standards to improve design outcomes and raise liveability standards, it remains concerned that appropriate levels of consumer protection are not in place as neither the use of architects nor minimum apartment sizes have been mandated, although the chapter believes that, in practise, bank lending policy will dictate minimum apartment sizes.<\/p>\n<p>The chapter believes there are several positive outcomes such as energy efficiency improvements and minimum room sizes, but says an overarching framework of design excellence is missing and it has ongoing concerns about the assessment process. The chapter maintains that design quality is best achieved through shared responsibility across three crucial stages: mandating the involvement of an architect, design-based regulations and good decision making through the use of design review panels. It argues that the Victorian Government\u2019s <em>Better Apartments Design Standards<\/em> do not adequately address two of the Institute\u2019s \u2018crucial stages\u2019. It has requested a 12 month review of the standards and the assessment process, and remains committed to working with the government to address one of the most critical challenges of our time: affordable, amenable and sustainable housing underpinning strong communities.<br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Apr 2017 We are continuing to work through the list of Institute policies that need updating, with ongoing consultation with members to ensure we are dealing with the issues that matter most to members and effectively communicating our messages to governments and the public. New policies can be developed at the instigation of the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Policy and Advocacy update<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":575,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[280],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15715","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-policy-updates"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Policy and Advocacy update - News &amp; Media<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Policy and Advocacy update - News &amp; Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&nbsp; Apr 2017 We are continuing to work through the list of Institute policies that need updating, with ongoing consultation with members to ensure we are dealing with the issues that matter most to members and effectively communicating our messages to governments and the public. New policies can be developed at the instigation of the &hellip; Continue reading Policy and Advocacy update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"News &amp; Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AusINSArchitects\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-04-19T23:09:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-19T23:13:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2017\/09\/aia-default-social.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"lauraj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@AusINSArchitect\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@AusINSArchitect\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"lauraj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"lauraj\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#\/schema\/person\/ba36d8044092dc6fefde134fd8c70c0f\"},\"headline\":\"Policy and Advocacy update\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-19T23:09:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-19T23:13:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/\"},\"wordCount\":1025,\"articleSection\":[\"Policy Updates\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/\",\"name\":\"Policy and Advocacy update - News &amp; Media\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-19T23:09:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-19T23:13:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#\/schema\/person\/ba36d8044092dc6fefde134fd8c70c0f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Policy and Advocacy update\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/\",\"name\":\"News &amp; Media\",\"description\":\"The Australian Institute of Architects\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#\/schema\/person\/ba36d8044092dc6fefde134fd8c70c0f\",\"name\":\"lauraj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/52ead4d46ef89ee944a66c0f66575abba9537165a8f63d818243fd6c9a696294?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/52ead4d46ef89ee944a66c0f66575abba9537165a8f63d818243fd6c9a696294?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"lauraj\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/author\/lauraj\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Policy and Advocacy update - News &amp; Media","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Policy and Advocacy update - News &amp; Media","og_description":"&nbsp; Apr 2017 We are continuing to work through the list of Institute policies that need updating, with ongoing consultation with members to ensure we are dealing with the issues that matter most to members and effectively communicating our messages to governments and the public. New policies can be developed at the instigation of the &hellip; Continue reading Policy and Advocacy update","og_url":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/","og_site_name":"News &amp; Media","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AusINSArchitects","article_published_time":"2017-04-19T23:09:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-19T23:13:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":640,"url":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2017\/09\/aia-default-social.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"lauraj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@AusINSArchitect","twitter_site":"@AusINSArchitect","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"lauraj","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/"},"author":{"name":"lauraj","@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#\/schema\/person\/ba36d8044092dc6fefde134fd8c70c0f"},"headline":"Policy and Advocacy update","datePublished":"2017-04-19T23:09:10+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-19T23:13:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/"},"wordCount":1025,"articleSection":["Policy Updates"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/","url":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/","name":"Policy and Advocacy update - News &amp; Media","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-04-19T23:09:10+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-19T23:13:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#\/schema\/person\/ba36d8044092dc6fefde134fd8c70c0f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/policy-and-advocacy-update\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Policy and Advocacy update"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/","name":"News &amp; Media","description":"The Australian Institute of Architects","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#\/schema\/person\/ba36d8044092dc6fefde134fd8c70c0f","name":"lauraj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/52ead4d46ef89ee944a66c0f66575abba9537165a8f63d818243fd6c9a696294?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/52ead4d46ef89ee944a66c0f66575abba9537165a8f63d818243fd6c9a696294?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"lauraj"},"url":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/author\/lauraj\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15715","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/575"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15715"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15715\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15722,"href":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15715\/revisions\/15722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15715"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15715"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.architecture.com.au\/news-media\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15715"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}