Author: Digital Ops

Expressions of Interest: Standards Australia

The Institute is currently a Nominating Organisation with Standards Australia, and we are currently participating in Standards Australia’s Standards Development activity. The Nominating Organisation appoints a representative to represent the views of that organisation’s interest group during the development of a Standard.

There is a vacancy for a representative to be a member of the Technical Committee FP-020 revising AS 3959.1-20 Construction of buildings in bushfire-prone areas. The Area of Activity for the committee is the development of a standard methodology to assist the regulatory authorities in the definition of bushfire-prone areas and to assess the likely severity of a bushfire attack together with the development of construction standards for the performance of a building with respect to the anticipated level of attack. Included in the scope are assessment methodology and construction requirements. Planning, siting, subdivision, and landscaping are excluded. The expected completion date is 24 Oct 2016. Your appointment as our representative will not extend beyond this revision.

The Institute is seeking a representative with demonstrated experience in regulatory matters and their complexity through current practice and for at least the past 15 years. As the Institute’s representative, you may be instructed by the National President or CEO to take a certain position in relation to an issue being considered and to promote that position in decision making.

Representatives must be prepared to commit to attending all meetings except in exceptional personal circumstances. Representatives are also expected to report back on the outcome of the project.

The Institute does not offer any remuneration for this representation and is only able to provide minimal reimbursement for travel expenses (to be agreed prior to attending a meeting).

If you are interested in representing the Institute on this committee, please provide the following information and email this to policy@architecture.com.au.

  1. Personal Information
    Name:
    Institute Member No:
    Practice:
    Postal Address:
    Email:
    Phone:
  2. Reason for wanting to join
  3. Expertise that will you bring to the committee
  4. Summary CV
    Please attach a 1-page summary CV with a focus on projects that relate to the standard under revision.
  5. Reference
    Please provide a supporting statement from a senior member of the Institute
  6. If you are unsuccessful, please indicate if you are willing to be an advisor to the successful person, and have your details passed to them.

Advocacy and Policy update

Jun 2016

This month

 

 

NATIONAL

Federal election
The Federal election campaign is underway. We are encouraging members to start conversations with their local candidates, whether for the House of Representatives or the Senate, to discuss their position on various issues around Designing Australia’s Future. Many of our members have said that they want to help, but just aren’t sure how. ‘Designing Australia’s Future’ campaign will rely on everyone doing a little bit – a collaborative effort to turn the discussion to a policy-making level. You will soon be receiving something in the mail to point you to the tools you need to write to your local candidates or to meet with them and have a discussion about Designing Australia’s Future. Materials include the Designing Australia’s Future booklet, fact sheets, talking points, and questions to ask. If you have a conversation, we would like you to share the results using our web page, or upload a related photo to Instagram, or mention it on Twitter with the hashtag #DesignOurFuture16.

 

Australian Consumer Law Amendments
The Australian Consumer Law Review Issues Paper has raised the possibility of removing the exemption from the implied fitness for purpose warranty that currently exists for architects and engineers under section 61 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

The Institute made a submission expressing our concerns that this matter has been raised again. The Institute believes that there is no market failure that requires the removal of the exemption, and that removal of the exemption will be detrimental to consumers and will adversely impact on architects, either as principals of smaller practices in particular, or employees dependent upon them for employment as architects. The review will provide other opportunities to comment on proposed changes, and will publish its findings in 2017. See the submission on our website.

 

Non-conforming building products
The Institute made a submission to the Building Ministers’ Working Group on strategies for dealing with non-conforming building products. The Institute put forward the view that there is a need to reform the current system to provide specifiers, purchasers, installers and certifiers with a clear mechanism to determine whether products are fit-for-purpose as defined under the National Construction Code. We also believe that actions need to be taken to remove non-conforming products at the point of sale and to proactively identify and remove non-conforming products from our buildings. One immediate solution to prevent further use of non-conforming products is for regulators to enforce existing regulations, which requires the appropriate resources to implement proper enforcement processes. See the submission on our website.

 

 

NORTHERN TERRITORY

Dual Occupancy in Zone SD
The NT chapter recently supported the introduction of Dual Occupancy to SD sites, as a natural and sustainable response to our increasing urban populations. They put forward the view that it is an effective planning instrument in reducing the sprawl of Darwin urban settlements. Correctly implemented, a Dual Occupancy policy is able to facilitate the provision of additional housing opportunities in areas which are proximate to goods and services, and with existing levels of high amenity. The submission also covered issues such as lot sizes, and design controls.

 

Remote Housing Designs 
The NT Chapter commented on the Department of Housing’s proposed remote housing designs, pointing out the expertise of NT architects to deliver climatically responsive and culturally appropriate housing for indigenous Australians. The Chapter commented on the process to be followed, consideration of climate in the design process, housing for health, disability access, energy performance, community development and tenancy support.

 

 

NEW SOUTH WALES

Planning reform
The Institute’s NSW Chapter was a founding member (with PIA, the Property Council and the Sydney Business Chamber) of the Coalition for NSW Planning Reform in 2007. The group met with Planning Minister Rob Stokes in February to persuade the Baird Government to improve the functioning of the planning system under the current legislation, while also providing stepping stones towards a more comprehensive overhaul through new legislation at a later date.

The NSW Government has recently had a series of consultations with industry and professional groups regarding amendments to the legislation that would go some way towards the achievement of the coalition’s objective. We are now preparing for another meeting with the Minister to urge him to make further, more substantial, reforms.

 

 

VICTORIA

Apartment Standards
In April, the Chapter made a further submission to the Department of Planning that will feed into the final draft of the standards that will be out for public comment in the next couple of weeks – we will respond to this next iteration of the draft.

Central City Built Form Controls
In May, the Chapter made a short submission to the Government on the proposed Melbourne C270 Amendment, which introduces floor area ratios (18:1) – this includes the proposal to use the Institute’s competition guidelines to run design competitions as one mechanism for encouraging design excellence.

Zoning Reform review
In April, the Chapter made a written submission and a physical presentation to the Residential Development Review Advisory Committee in response to an invitation to comment on the application of zones that provide for residential development in metropolitan Melbourne and the four regional cities of Bendigo, Ballarat, Geelong and Latrobe.

Registration of Project Managers
In May, Chapter members had an initial meeting with the Department of Planning to discuss regulatory impact statement being developed to review potential to mandate the registration of project managers.

 

 

WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Planning issues
The WA Chapter informed the new Minister for Planning of the major concerns held by the Institute on issues such as housing diversity and density, development assessment panels, and South Perth Amendment No 46.

Pavilion of Australia opens in Venice

at the 15th International Architecture Exhibition – La Biennale di Venezia

Creative Directors Amelia Holliday, Michelle Tabet and Isabelle Toland with Olympian Ian Thorpe at the entrance to Australia’s exhibition, The Pool. Photo: Alexander Mayes
Creative Directors Amelia Holliday, Michelle Tabet and Isabelle Toland with Olympian Ian Thorpe at the entrance to Australia’s exhibition, The Pool. Photo: Alexander Mayes

 

The Pavilion of Australia’s exhibition The Pool officially opened today (Thursday, 26th May – 7pm AEST) with a ceremony and Ian Thorpe, Olympic gold medal winning swimmer, in attendance

 

One of Australia’s greatest cultural symbols – the pool – forms the foundation of the Australian Exhibition at the Biennale Architettura 2016, which will run from May 28 to November 27 2016.

The Australian Exhibition, presented by the Australian Institute of Architects and curated by Aileen Sage Architects (Isabelle Toland and Amelia Holliday) with Michelle Tabet, uses the pool as a lens through which to explore Australian cultural identity.

Their manifesto encourages the audience to step outside the architect-to-architect discourse to show how a familiar, common object, the pool, is in fact pregnant with cultural significance; it is both artefact and catalyst of change.

The Pool is about public space as a vital component to society and shows the many ways in which its public character is interpreted and occupied.

The Creative Directors of The Pool said:

‘Pools in Australia are currently facing significant challenges as social institutions. The threatened closure and demolition of Australian public pools is a perennial theme of community protest and activism and is an issue to which architects and urban commentators are inevitably drawn.

‘By identifying the pool’s cultural importance to Australia, we are pushing for a more critical engagement with the civic and social values that underpin our work as architects. The power and breadth of these places should not be underestimated nor simply jettisoned as uneconomical. Architecture can and does have an impact that transcends conventional economic models.’

Through the description of events, experiences, histories or memories, the narratives presented collectively describe a powerful relationship between place and society, intrinsic to this year’s Biennale Architettura theme Reporting from the Front.

The Creative Directors have selected eight prominent cultural leaders to share their personal stories, to explore the relationship between the pool, its architecture and Australian cultural identity. The contributors include Olympic gold medal winning swimmers Ian Thorpe and Shane Gould; environmentalist and 2007 Australian of the Year Tim Flannery; fashion designers Romance Was Born; writer of best-selling book The Slap Christos Tsiolkas; winner of the 2012 Miles Franklin Prize Anna Funder; Indigenous art curator Hetti Perkins and Australian rock-musician Paul Kelly.

Visitors enjoying Australia’s exhibition, The Pool. Photo: Alexander Mayes
Visitors enjoying Australia’s exhibition, The Pool. Photo: Alexander Mayes

 

10.Australian Pavilion - The Pool by Aileen Sage Architects (Amelia Holliday and Isabelle Toland) with Michelle Tabet. Photo Brett Boardman
Australian Pavilion – The Pool by Aileen Sage Architects (Amelia Holliday and Isabelle Toland) with Michelle Tabet. Photo: Brett Boardman

International profile: GreenhilLi

What brought you to Singapore, how long have you been in practice there?

Nigel arrived to work on Circle Line in 2001 and Sau Kei relocated from Sydney in 1997 after being offered a job just before the Olympic boom.

We’ve been working in Singapore since, mostly on transit architecture, apart from 1 year in 2004 spent in Perth to design the Perth Underground & Esplanade Stations.
We started our practice in January 2005 & haven’t looked back since.

 

How much of your work is based in Singapore, and what makes Singapore a good place to practice?

Currently all our work is based in Singapore, all public projects; but in the past years, we’ve done work in various parts of Australia, Middle East & Nigeria.

Singapore has good regional & global connectively. It also has a good economic climate to establish and develop a company. Given our transit architecture expertise, we were able to obtain projects which we would not have been able to undertake elsewhere.

 

Could you give us an idea of the main places your projects have been built?

Singapore, Riyadh, Dubai, Qatar, Nigeria, Perth (Australia)

New Wings at the Asian Civilisations Museum in Singapore by GreenhilLi, photo courtesy of GreenhilLi
New Wings at the Asian Civilisations Museum in Singapore by GreenhilLi, photo courtesy of GreenhilLi

What is the most significant project your practice has completed recently, or what project is the most important project in recent years?

The most significant completed project are the 2 titanium-clad extensions at the Asian Civilisations Museum, completed November 2015. Perth City Link , completed December 2013, was a milestone for us in terms of it’s significance to the city and unlocking future development and urban connectivity opportunities. Our 2 interchange stations, Expo & Tampines on Downtown Line in Singapore, designed for complex development & urban integration in regional centres, have been our longest running projects since 2008 and due for completion next year.

 

Why does international membership of the Institute appeal to your practice?

To get connected with the international Australian architectural fraternity. Opportunity to showcase works.

New Wings at the Asian Civilisations Museum in Singapore by GreenhilLi, photo courtesy GreenhilLi
New Wings at the Asian Civilisations Museum in Singapore by GreenhilLi, photo courtesy GreenhilLi

We pitched the same questions to Jean Francois Milou (studioMilou), read the interview here.

From the National President

Photo by Brett Boardman
Ken Maher, photo by Brett Boardman

It’s just over a week since I had the privilege and responsibility of taking on the Presidency, at a time when a lot is happening at the Institute – the opportunities we have before us are exciting. I was delighted by the overwhelming support given to the much needed governance changes at the AGM, and also to have Jennifer Cunich on board as our new CEO. This marks a turning point as we now can look forward rather than back. We are committed to a 60/40 gender balance for the new board, and have already commenced searching for the external board members. In her first weeks Jennifer will be travelling around the country to meet councillors, members, and importantly her management teams to commence a process of close engagement and working together towards a more cohesive Institute.

We are also developing an advocacy position for the upcoming Federal Election, which provides an opportunity for us all to champion our local candidates. We will be running a direct lobbying campaign as well as a providing a web-based resource for members.

We will be advocating the delivery of transport, and social and green infrastructure to be led by holistic strategic planning combined with better coordination and collaboration across all tiers of government, the private sector, researchers, and the wider community. There is a need for more flexible and adaptable financial arrangements through intergovernmental agreements linked to specific outcomes, and connecting issues of housing, employment, environment and infrastructure. The protection of our natural environment and adopting effective strategies to achieve the Paris COP21 agreements involve a commitment to action within the built environment. More specifically we will be seeking commitments for a National Design Policy, Design Quality legislation for residential apartments nationally, a national Design Advisory body, and elevating through legislation the role of architects in complex projects.

Last week I attended the AIA Convention in Philadelphia and engaged with many other Presidents from around the globe on the challenges facing us all as architects, as well as exploring the agenda for the forthcoming UN Habitat III conference in Ecuador, which will address climate change, cities and crises in housing supply and affordability. Later this week the Biennale Architetturra will launch in Venice. Australia’s immersive and experiential exhibition by Aileen Sage Architects (Isabelle Toland and Amelia Holliday) with Michelle Tabet in the new Denton Corker Marshall designed pavilion explores ways in which the pool has shaped our diverse egalitarian communities. Australian architects have turned out in force to support our entry, and to learn from the vast international participation in Pritzker Prize winner Alejandro Aravena’s agenda to explore how architecture can make a real difference to people’s lives.

On a sad note, over the past few months we have lost three distinguished members of our profession –all Gold Medallists. Ken Woolley who has made a significant contribution to Sydney’s residential and cultural works, John Morphett who through his direct link to the Bauhaus has championed wider collaboration within the profession, and Aldo Giurgola whose international influence through exemplary projects and teaching has been significant. Each have made an exemplary contribution to the art of architecture in their own way.

We owe much to Jon Clements for his relentless focus and generous leadership of the Institute over the past year in a time of significant reform – never an easy task but implemented with grace. David Karotkin should be congratulated for his key role in implementing the governance review, and together with Jon, the Executive and senior staff over the past 18 months have pursued these changes to reposition the Institute. Our governance will now be more efficient, but more significantly will allow National Council to work with Chapter Councils in focusing on strategy, on members, on education and nurturing of our future architects, and on strong and effective advocacy.

While there are many challenges for our profession of architecture, I think we have cause for optimism as the role and value of design is becoming recognised as critical in achieving a sustainable, just and fulfilling future. I look forward to working with our new CEO, National Council, staff and members on increasing our transparency and effectiveness, supporting the diverse interests of our profession, and advocating its value to the community.

 

Ken Maher

National President

International news: May 2016

Oasia Downtown by WOHA, photo by Patrick Bingham-Hall
Oasia Downtown by WOHA, photo by Patrick Bingham-Hall

View from Singapore

Report by International Chapter Councillor, Justin Hill FRAIA

 

Normally buoyed by a healthy property market, with many new condominiums on the go at any one time, things are slowing in Singapore. We are no longer running out of sand, concrete and piling rigs (as we did during the rapid roll-out of two large casino developments in recent years). Word on the street is that few new apartment buildings will be built for a while, and in the commercial market, millions of square feet of office space are about to come onto a market in oversupply.

While this may be good news for renters in Singapore, now reported to be one of the most expensive cities in the world for expatriates based here, it is not so good for many architects, used to local volume to underpin their practices in the past. Now many look farther afield from Singapore to export their professional services.

That said, Singapore’s organisation and connectivity, plus transparency in its regulatory, taxation and financial sectors still provide a well-oiled, compact engine encouraging change. So we now take more flights to more places, and sometimes travel farther to keep things going here.

Employment in architecture seems often to be the litmus test for the industry. Retrenchments have been taking place, and the once almost automatic working visa for foreign graduates from approved universities is becoming harder to obtain, as the Government moves to secure its home workforce and to focus capability.

However, it is not all doom and gloom. We have been through cycles like these before, and the rebound seems to always happen, propped as it often is by a massive increase in infrastructure investment, sensibly, by the Government. This is financed in part by a sovereign wealth fund the envy of many countries.

Currently, Singapore Changi Airport is being expanded with a new Terminal 5 and a third 12,000 ft. runway, slated to double capacity to 100 million passengers annually by the mid 2020s. A new terminal 4, for budget airlines, is nearing completion as well. This is to secure the city’s position as a leading air traffic hub, to underpin the national airline and bolster employment (the airport currently employs over 160,000 and accounts for 6% of GDP here). Beneath the city, the underground train network is also rapidly expanding. 21km of new train track and 16 stations will open by 2017, and a further 41km and 31 stations will open progressively from 2019. The MRT map here suddenly starts to resemble its London predecessor, for example.

On the architectural design front, things continue to look interesting, with high-quality results. WoHa is about to complete a dramatic city building, Oasia Hotel Downtown, which is boldly clad in red coloured metal mesh and which will eventually become completely covered in green creepers all the way to the top of the 27 storey building. And facing the Padang in the heart of Singapore, the National Gallery which is built within the colonial era Supreme Court and Legislative Assembly Buildings, has recently opened. The project is the work of studioMilou, [lead by new International Chapter member, Jean-Francois Milou] who with the local practice CPG won the international competition for the project several years ago.


Read the latest member profiles with GreenhilLi and studioMilou.

International profile: Jean Francois Milou

What brought you to Singapore, how long have you been in practice there?

In 2007, my studio in Paris won the international competition to design the National Gallery Singapore. I felt that with a project of this scale, around 60, 000 square metres and a budget of over 500million SGD, it was essential to set up a firm in situ, with a dedicated team. Initially, I was not entirely sure as to whether I would be moving between Paris and Singapore for the duration of the project, but the demands of the project sorted that out pretty swiftly.

Moving to Singapore give me the day-to-day involvement in all aspects of the design development and construction which I both enjoy and felt to be essential in this case. The brief for the Gallery involved converting two of the country’s most significant monuments, the Supreme Court and City Hall, into a world-class gallery for modern Southeast Asian art. These buildings witnessed the surrender of the Japanese to the allied forces in the Second World War and the declaration of Singaporean independence in 1965. Their sentimental and historic importance to Singapore being great, and the brief also asked that the changes to be made in transforming the buildings should respect their historic integrity. Being in Singapore, I could oversee the intricate and demanding balance of transforming and conserving the buildings, and develop the kind of trust and understanding within our team, and with the client and other local partners, that always helps things run more smoothly.

We’ve had the studio there since 2008.

 

National Gallery Singapore by studioMilou, photo by Fernando Javier Urquijo
National Gallery Singapore by studioMilou, photo by Fernando Javier Urquijo

 

How much of your work is based in Singapore, and what makes Singapore a good place to practice?

Now that the National Gallery Singapore project is winding down, we are working on a smaller scale and prospecting for new projects. With our focus on cultural and civic projects, our opportunities in a smaller country are not as great as in Europe. We’ve expanded more in Vietnam for the time being, with one recently completed project being the Centre for Science and Education in Quy Nhon, a city in the Central Vietnam province of Binh Dinh.

Our plan is to remain in Singapore, as we have an exceptional team and the discipline and dedication to excellent urban planning and sound architectural design is something I respect a great deal.

 

Could you give us an idea of the main places your projects have been built?

studioMilou’s work is largely based in France, Singapore and Vietnam.

 

What is the most significant project your practice has completed recently, or what project is the most important project in recent years?

I would say both the National Gallery Singapore, and the Carreau du Temple, in Paris. The latter involved the conversion of a 19th-century glass and steel covered market structure in the Marais district, into a culture and sporting venue.

 

Why does international membership of the Institute appeal to your practice?

Over the past 8 years in Singapore in particular, we have kept a close eye on the Australian architectural scene. We did apply for the Flinders Street Station project, and we keep an eye on tenders.

I personally feel drawn to the sensitivity and respect for the natural environment that characterizes so much of the country’s best design. I would hope that as a Paris and Singapore-based firm, studioMilou can contribute to the exchanges that being a member facilitates. Our entire team in both Paris and Singapore are delighted by the membership, I add.

On a personal level, the membership is a real honour. I have spent a great deal of time in Australia over the past 15 years since meeting my Australian wife, who works with the studio as a heritage specialist. We have three lovely Australian daughters and I am applying for permanent residency. Whenever we can, we visit the family in Melbourne before taking off on long coastal road trips.

FernandoJavierUrquijo_studioMilou
National Gallery Singapore by studioMilou, photo by Fernando Javier Urquijo

We pitched the same questions to GreenhilLi, read the interview here.

Message from the new CEO

jennifercunich_001_highres

Dear members,

This is my first day as the Australian Institute of Architects’ new CEO. I’m incredibly excited about the tremendous opportunities ahead to help grow the Institute’s already highly regarded reputation across the country.

It’s a privilege to represent your interests and to work with a first class board of directors, chapters, committee members and staff team.

I’m very keen to hear your views about the challenges and opportunities facing our profession and will be travelling to as many of the chapters as possible over the next six weeks to attend local Chapter Council meetings and Awards ceremonies.

We have a new strategic plan focusing on member services, education and advocacy and at Friday’s AGM our new governance structure was passed. These changes will provide many new opportunities for the profession and our members and I am eager to receive your feedback.

I’ll also reach out to the major industry bodies and professional institutions to work in close collaboration with all who seek to foster greater awareness of design in our built environment, and how architecture and creative design are part of a solution to many problems.

Above all, my focus is the Institute and you the members. I look forward to engaging with you.

On a final note, I thank the interim CEO, Greg Ridder, Jon Clements and Ken Maher for their hard work and support during this transition phase.

Warmest regards,
Jennifer Cunich

 

Governance changes passed at Institute of Architects’ AGM

Newly appointed National President, Ken Maher is pleased to announce the amendments to the governance structure of the Australian Institute of Architects have been passed at the Annual General Meeting in Melbourne.

The changes will see a Board of Directors established to manage the fiduciary and legal obligations of the Institute, freeing up the member-elected National Council to focus on policy, strategy and the issues most important to members and the profession.

‘It is an exciting time for the Institute and these changes will only strengthen the ability of the Institute to advocate on behalf of our members and provide the services contemporary practices need,’ Maher said.

‘I would like to congratulate and thank my predecessors David Karotkin, Jon Clements and the National Executive on their hard work and dedication in bringing about these effective changes.’

An independent review of the Institute’s governance structure by Henry Bosch AO in 2015 identified a number of difficulties in effective governance experienced by the 16 strong National Council managing the full duties of directorship.

The new model comes into effect from 22 August and will consist of a smaller Board of Directors made up of five National Councillors including the President, President-Elect and Immediate Past President and two elected members of National Council. The Board will also be supported by up to three independent directors with specialised skillsets.

National Council will remain a fully member-elected group of 16 representing each of the states and territories along with nationally-elected members.

The changes will be written into the Memorandum & Articles of the Institute (Constitution) and includes a mandate for the Board to have a minimum of three female and three male directors.

Advocacy and Policy update – May

This month’s policy update covers two federal initiatives; the Smart Cities Plan and a summary of the Federal budget.

 

SMART CITIES PLAN

The Australian Institute of Architects welcomed the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet’s Smart Cities Plan released at the Cities Summit in Melbourne on Friday 29 April. The building sector has long called for a whole-of-government approach to planning, energy efficiency measures, infrastructure investment and urban design, to create better long-term outcomes for cities.

Professor Ken Maher, President Elect of the Institute congratulated the Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP and Assistant Minister for Cities and Digital Transformation, the Hon Angus Taylor MP on an ambitious and timely plan for Australian cities.

‘The Institute is passionate about improving the quality of our built environment and addressing the urban challenges. Cities have been the orphan of public policy in the past and we have long advocated that the Federal government focus on Australia’s future towns and cities. This plan places cities firmly on the agenda.’

‘Architects are firm believers in strategic capital city planning to promote globally competitive, productive, sustainable and socially inclusive cities’ Prof Maher said.
The initiative was warmly received by the profession when it was discussed at the National Architecture Conference held in Adelaide on April 30.

The Transforming Populations session of the conference, chaired by Prof Maher heard about the bold ambition to create 30 minute cities, and to deliver a vision for the cities of the future where there is less reliance on cars and better transport connections, where density is done well, where infrastructure planning follows strategic urban planning, and where communities are brought together in a way that supports liveability and sustainability.

‘Collaboration between all levels of government and industry is the key to making City Deals a success’ according to Prof Maher.

‘One area that has not been addressed is the critical importance of design in building the cities of tomorrow. While the plan includes an examination of housing supply and planning changes, it is essential that architecture is used as an agency to improve the built environment and to produce sociable and equitable cities, and for the delivery design excellence to be a requirement for all project funding.’

We will be looking closely at the Smart Cities Plan over the coming weeks to provide further input. We are actively seeking members’ views. Please forward any comments to policy@architecture.com.au

 

FEDERAL BUDGET

The Federal Budget was delivered on Tuesday May 3. The following summarises some of the key points:

The Economy

  • The government expects an underlying cash deficit of $37.1 billion in 2016-17, down from an estimated $39.8 billion in 2015-16
  • The government had forecast the deficit falling to $6 billion by 2019-20 and a balanced budget by 2020-21
  • Inflation is forecast to grow to 2 per cent by 2016-17

 

Income tax

  • The upper limit for the middle income tax bracket is to rise to $87,000 from $80,000 from 1 July
  • The upper limit for the middle income tax bracket is to rise to $87,000 from $80,000 from 1 July
  • The temporary deficit levy of 2 per cent on income over $180,000 will be introduced in 2017

 

Infrastructure

  • An additional $33 billion over the forward estimates is provided to deliver road and rail upgrades
  • $594 million is to go to Australian Rail Track Corporation for the proposed Melbourne/Brisbane rail link
  • $2 billion has been allocated for investment in dams and pipelines nationally

 

Superannuation

  • Savings are to come from lowering the caps on concessional super contributions — such as employer payments and salary sacrifice — to $25,000 a year
  • The amount of super that can be transferred into zero-tax retirement phase accounts will be limited to $1.6 million

 

Small business

  • The small business tax rate will be lowered by 1 per cent to 27.5 per cent
  • The turnover threshold for small businesses increased from $2 million to $10 million giving access to tax incentives
  • From 1 July, the increase to instant write-off for equipment purchases will be extended until 30 June 2017 to businesses with a turnover less than $10 million
  • Access to tax concessions increased to more than 90,000 additional small businesses

 

Jobs

  • Youth job seekers who need to boost their job-readiness will take part in intensive pre-employment skills within five months of registering with jobactive
  • An internship program with up to 120,000 placements over four years will be introduced to help young job seekers who have been employed for six months or more
  • Job seekers will receive $200 per fortnight on top of their regular income support payment while doing an internship
  • Businesses will receive an upfront payment of $1000 when they take on an intern
  • Australian employers will be eligible for a Youth Bonus wage subsidy between $6500 and $10,000 depending on young person’s job readiness

 

Education

  • Investment to education, training and child care will increase to more than $41.8 million in 2016-17. Early education and care will increase by 9.6 per cent to $8.6 billion, schools will rise by 8 per cent to $17.6 billion, higher education will increase by 0.9 per cent to $12.3 billion and skills up 7.7 per cent to $3.3 billion
  • The Government’s Higher Education reforms have been delayed by 12 months and university fee