What is the difference between using an architect and a building designer?  This is a common question asked by people outside the profession and one that is important to be able to answer clearly.

The key differences are education, insurance and the code of ethics. All three aspects act to protect the client and the public. None are required of designers outside the profession.

The education component has two facets.  The first is study at a tertiary level at an accredited school of architecture, which is structured to promote holistic and lateral thinking that enables architects to arrive at well resolved, fit for purpose, delightful outcomes.  The second is ongoing education post graduation, required to ensure that architects remain up to date with the rapidly changing world we operate in.

In South Australia the quantum of continuing education to be completed per year is not mandated as a requirement of Registration.  However, this does not mean that continuing education is optional.  It is still required under the Act, with a minimum of 20 points per year the national standard recommended by the Institute and the Architects Accreditation Council of Australia.

For those architects who are unclear about the obligation to undertake ongoing education post graduation a first step should be to familiarise yourself with the APBSA Code of Conduct and Guidance Note 4 – Continuing Architectural Education, both of which can be found on the Board’s website www.archboardsa.org.au

While you are there, take time to view the “What does an architect do?” films.  They provide insight into the multifaceted and unique profession of architecture and add to the conversation regarding the distinction between an architect and a building designer.

Nicolette Di Lernia, SA Chapter Manager