Author: lauraj

Recruitment: Honestly, transparently…apparently

 

MICHAEL GAY

20 Nov, 2017

 

How do you do your interview?
Do you prepare?
Do you polish your ‘self-inflation’ skills?
Do you update a CV and portfolio?
Probably.

 
What if none of that mattered?
What if statistics suggested you weren’t going to be hired on account of bias?
What if you were seen as a potential liability because you have a family?
You’d probably be pretty upset, then frustrated and then angry.

Substantial research suggests that women face this every time they sit down to a job interview. Managers of both sexes are twice as likely to hire a man over a woman despite equal skill sets. Parlour’s fifth guide to equitable practice; Recruitment, provides advice on fair and equitable recruitment strategies and processes. There are obviously two sides to the table and things that both parties can do better. In reality though, neither party is usually conscious of the scenario playing out.

I’m an employer. I’ve been an employee. I’m male and have usually been interviewed by other males. So what opinions do I have on the status of gender bias in architectural recruitment? I’ll attempt to explain.

 

HONEST

My life has changed completely since having my twin sleep thieves. The first three months were a productivity right off. If I wasn’t self-employed, I’m sure I would have lost my job. Luckily, I have a very understanding business partner.

22 months on, I’m still not back in the office on regular full time hours. With my wife working three days and me four days, we manage the situation fairly well with the help of some ‘bubba’ (grandmother) days. Most of the other hours are at night after kids have gone to sleep… (Sunday night as I write). Melatonin usually gets the better of me though. Through this time, I have often thought what it would be like if I had to get a position in someone else’s practice?

 

TRANSPARENT

First of all, how many architectural practices are there looking for part-time employees? Only a few, despite the benefits.

Ok, so let’s try a full time position and negotiate some flexibility.

‘I need four days a week with the day off on Wednesday and a laptop so I can work the other day on the weekend or at night. I need to leave at 5:00pm on the dot and I can’t do overtime without at least a week’s notice’.

As a recovering long time subscriber to the ‘go hard or go home’ long hours culture, I know true flexibility is frowned upon and I know you are often seen as not committed if life comes before practice. I’d be very reluctant to even raise the topic at an interview knowing full well that there is probably someone else willing to do whatever it takes to get the job and do the job.

Next plan is to not mention anything.

Despite being fully capable of doing the work, it’s hard to sit there and say I’m going to bust a gut and prioritise the company above all else… because I know that’s not reality and it’s not priority. Instead, maybe I’ll turn the volume down, adjust the tone and go for a more modest approach. ‘Under-sell and over-deliver’. Rest assured though, there will be someone over-selling… and likely under-delivering. Who is the average manager going to employ?

 

APPARENT

Bias in recruitment impacts severely on women and particularly those with family commitments. Some of it is unconscious but there are still conscious steps that can be made to minimise its impact. This isn’t just about gender balance, it’s also about achieving a more diverse and interesting range of people within one organisation.

If like, hires like, hires like… you end up with zero diversity and a group think scenario which will flow on to client types, business structures and ultimately the success or failure of the company. Diversity can be scary for an employer though, particularly a small one. Bravery is required to invest time and money in people and scenarios that aren’t within a practice’s current consideration of ‘cultural fit’.

There needs to be considered thought when searching, shortlisting and interviewing candidates, and then again when starting employment. Understanding the Fair Work Act, Architects Award and anti-discrimination laws are also critical to making sure the process is as fair and equitable as it can be. Where possible, both men and women should be involved in all stages of the recruitment process to mitigate gender bias and provide a balance to the tone of adverts, interviews and negotiation.

With these things in place, a good employer is able to widen their search net, interview without bias and hopefully recruit a good employee. In turn, a prospective employee can be open, honest and transparent about their commitment to architecture, work and life.

 

See previous NCGE articles here

From the ACT President

Festival Season

The Design Canberra Festival is upon us and it’s another big one for the ACT Chapter. We have numerous events occurring throughout the next three weeks, and I encourage you to attend as many as you can. Visit designcanberrafestival.com.au/events/ to see what’s on offer.

This is our biggest opportunity to illustrate the value of good design to the community and advocate for the use of architects in the shaping of this city. Many thanks to everyone involved in rolling out the programs, including Sheila Hughes, Shannon Battisson, Jack Shimada, Evan Williamson, Yuri Leong Maish, Catherine Townsend, Michael Jasper, Tony Trobe, and Aarthi Ayyar-Biddle.

National Awards

The ACT Chapter was delighted to host the 2017 National Architecture Awards at Albert Hall on Thursday 2nd November. It was a terrific event, although I admit a tad cold at the outdoor after party. And the ACT winners were:

Commercial Architecture: National Award – Willinga Park by Cox Architecture, National Commendation – NewActon Nishi by Fender Katsalidis Architects

Heritage: National Commendation – Embassy of Sweden by Guida Moseley Brown Architects

Interior Architecture: National Commendation – Canberra Airport – International by Guida Moseley Brown Architects

For more information, go to: wp.architecture.com.au/awards-2017/winners/

National Council

I attended my last National Council meeting last week. It has been an honour to represent the ACT at the national table and contribute to discussions on the future of our institute. I’m sure that they are probably relieved to see the departure of the raging redhead with youthful perspectives!

You will be aware that we have been going through a large restructure of the organisation, and it was clear from the last meeting that we have pushed through the administrative elements and can now focus on delivering tangible improvements for our members. Our new governance structure and strategic plan will enable us to rebrand our Institute with confidence and, with support from our national committees (Policy, Practice, Gender Equity, and Education) and numerous taskforce’s, we can now target key areas of Advocacy, Education, and Membership support to strengthen our industry and the people within it. Look out for a new digital media platform by the end of 2018!

In my last meeting I presented a paper on, and discussed the importance of, engaging with students, graduates, and emerging architects, as they are the future of our institute. I have full confidence that the incoming National President, Clare Cousins, and the current National EmAGN President, Ksenia Totoeva, will continue to support my campaign and drive changes to assist this important demographic.

Elections

Expressions of interest for the Chapter President position and Chapter Councillor positions are now open. Feel free to contact me if you are considering these roles. I have plenty of positive stories to share.  Note: Nominations close on 17th November 2017.

From the National President

Richard Kirk

National President, Richard Kirk. Photo by Toby Scott
 
 
Nov 2017 

Last Thursday’s National Architecture Awards ceremony in Canberra was a fantastic culmination of the 2017 Awards program.

One of the most enjoyable parts of my role as President was the opportunity to attend many of the state and territory Awards functions around the country earlier in the year.  This provided a rare insight into the diversity of work from around the country and internationally that demonstrates the versatility and depth of the architectural profession.  

Observing how architects can make a great impact within the community and where positive legacies are left that well exceed the boundaries of the site and limits of the brief, has been a reaffirmation of the potency of architecture when deployed with skill and dedication.

In recognising design excellence through the Awards program we are also acknowledging the essential role of passionate and supportive clients who are very much a part of the recognition of the awards received throughout the program.

I congratulate all the entrants and their clients for their contribution to the quality of the work honoured last week and earlier in the year.

On behalf of the Institute I would like to thank the National Jury led by Ken Maher for their incredible contribution in time and intellect to the challenge of visiting all of the 72 strong shortlist over a two week period from as far as the Daintree to the Pilbara.  

I would also like to thank the Institute staff for their tireless efforts in producing such a successful Awards program, over twelve months in the making.

Read all about the 2017 National Award winners here.

 

Although the Awards program is one of most visible advocacy programs, it is certainly not the only significant undertaking of the Institute in furthering the cause of the profession and supporting our members.

I often refer to the iceberg analogy where much of the work we do is hidden from view. A lot of work happens behind the scenes – and it is critical work in a profession so closely impacted by State and National legislation.

Over any year our Chapter and National Committees produce numerous submissions and undertake media programs to ensure government policies and programs are well informed and have a focus on the public interest when it comes to articulating the importance of making our cities and towns equitable and sustainable.

Through our new National Policy Committee the Institute’s policies are being refreshed and will expand on the work already completed in 2017 including our new Multi-residential Standards Policy, Work Experience and Internships Policy  and our submissions to the Finkel Review and Senate Enquiry into non-conforming building products.
In addition to these, each of the local Chapters have prepared their own submissions in the last year covering diverse planning and procurement issues.

Although the message is a dry one, I wanted to use this opportunity to convey the importance of this work as a part of our complete advocacy agenda for the profession and that it is produced with the assistance of your fellow members on a voluntary basis.

The Institute will shortly be launching our new three-year Strategic Plan, an extension of the hard work already undertaken over our recent journey of renewal and transformation.  

The Institute is now more focused on delivering the professional leadership and services that prioritise your needs as practitioners. To that end we will need a much greater engagement and involvement from our members to ensure we are an essential partner in your practices and careers.

To continue the transformation, we need greater support and more resources. There is an opportunity for the Institute membership to grow substantially – whilst we have great engagement with the smaller practices– it is generally the larger practices (which employ the largest segment of the profession) that participate the least in the Institute.

In essence, we have set the Institute on a trajectory of reform and capacity building, with the members and the profession as its focus – we think it is timely for our largest stakeholders to reconnect and re-engage to help us continue our great legacy as an important institution.

The Institute is one of the oldest institutions within the Country.  This year for example, the Victorian Chapter celebrated 161 years, Queensland 129 years and NSW 146 years.  It is this longevity that brings clarity to us that the Institute is a worthwhile legacy and the Board, together with the National Council, have been focused on how to guarantee the Institute is well managed to ensure we are able to plan well into the future.

I personally look forward to building with you an Institute that is a strong voice for architecture and an Institute that makes a stronger profession for architects.  

Richard Kirk
National President

Regions surprise and delight, dominating 2017 Architecture Awards

From the Pilbara to Darwin, the Daintree and a remote bay on Tasmania’s Bruny Island, the winners of this year’s Australian Institute of Architects’ National Architecture Awards show that some of the most exceptional architectural contributions are coming increasingly from our regions.

A greater number of emerging practices also featured among the 44 projects earning a place on the 2017 winners list announced in Canberra tonight.

Jury chair and Immediate Past President Ken Maher said the Awards play a significant role in illuminating the value architects bring to our clients and community, as well as stimulating debate and defining values within the profession.

‘The jury gave preference to projects demonstrating the contribution architecture can make to the public good; projects that were inventive in their responses to context, site and program; and those that celebrated an understanding of materials and making,’ Maher said.

This year’s jury had the daunting task of awarding projects from the largest field of entries received in the almost four decades since the national awards program began, with a total of 983 entries received and 72 shortlisted for national honours.

Despite this, Maher observed that the jury’s experience was that ‘truly exceptional work speaks so powerfully that little debate is necessary – just an unspoken shared sense of joy and admiration.’

‘Public architecture projects were strong, particularly in their contribution to community and their social and cultural benefits, where design invention has expanded the brief and delivered extraordinary value,’ Maher noted.

The East Pilbara Arts Centre by Officer Woods Architects won the Sir Zelman Cowen Award for Public Architecture with its ‘masterstroke building-within-a-building concept’ that quadrupled the client’s original brief for a five-hundred-square-metre arts centre and enabled ‘a group of remote Indigenous artists to make a substantial and tangible contribution to a town centre, thereby exemplifying reconciliation in this country.’

Perched on a remote site on Tasmania’s Bruny Island, the historic 1830s Captain Kelly’s Cottage by John Wardle Architects won the Eleanor Cullis-Hill Award for Residential Architecture – Houses (Alterations and Additions) and a National Commendation for Heritage in what the jury described as ‘a labour of love and passion’ to bring the residence ‘from an advanced state of decay to a rebirth where old and new lend each other fresh beauty.’

The hotly contested Robin Boyd Award for Residential Architecture – Houses (New) was won by Durbach Block Jaggers Architects for Tamarama House with what the jury described as sublime detailing and beautifully sculpted spaces.

In a very strong showing, four projects received accolades in the Educational Architecture category this year. The East Sydney Early Learning Centre by Andrew Burges Architects in association with the City of Sydney won The Daryl Jackson Award, with National Awards going to Albert Park College Environmental Arts Hub by Six Degrees Architects, which also won the Lachlan Macquarie Award for Heritage, St Joseph’s Nudgee College Hanly Learning Centre by m3architecture and the UQ Forgan Smith Building – TC Beirne School of Law and Walter Harrison Library Refurbishment by BVN, the latter also receiving a National Award for Interior Architecture.

In total, the national jury presented 35 awards and 13 commendations across the 14 categories.

 

Full list of winners:

Commercial Architecture

The Harry Seidler Award – The EY Centre by fjmt (NSW)
National Award – Willinga Park by Cox Architecture (ACT)
National Commendation – NewActon Nishi by Fender Katsalidis Architects (ACT)

 

Educational Architecture

The Daryl Jackson Award – East Sydney Early Learning Centre by Andrew Burges Architects in association with the City of Sydney (NSW)
National Award – Albert Park College Environmental Arts Hub by Six Degrees Architects (Vic)
National Award – St Joseph’s Nudgee College Hanly Learning Centre by m3architecture (Qld)
National Award – UQ Forgan Smith Building – TC Beirne School of Law and Walter Harrison Library Refurbishment by BVN (Qld)

 

Enduring Architecture

National Award – 17 Wylde Street by Aaron M Bolot (NSW)

 

Heritage

The Lachlan Macquarie Award – Albert Park College Environmental Arts Hub by Six Degrees Architects (Vic)
National Award – Juanita Nielsen Community Centre by Neeson Murcutt Architects Pty Ltd in association with City of Sydney (NSW)
National Award – 100 Harris Street by SJB (NSW)
National Commendation – Captain Kelly’s Cottage by John Wardle Architects (Tas)
National Commendation – Embassy of Sweden by Guida Moseley Brown Architects (ACT)

 

Interior Architecture

The Emil Sodersten Award – Indigo Slam by Smart Design Studio (NSW)
National Award – UQ Forgan Smith Building – TC Beirne School of Law and Walter Harrison Library Refurbishment by BVN (Qld)
National Commendation – Canberra Airport – International by Guida Moseley Brown Architects (ACT)
National Commendation – The Gipson Commons, St Michael’s Grammar School by Architectus (Vic)

 

International Architecture

The Jørn Utzon Award – Amanemu by Kerry Hill Architects (Japan)
Australian Award – SkyVille @ Dawson by WOHA (Singapore)

 

Public Architecture

The Sir Zelman Cowen Award – East Pilbara Arts Centre by Officer Woods Architects (WA)
National Award – Juanita Nielsen Community Centre by Neeson Murcutt Architects Pty Ltd in association with City of Sydney (NSW)
National Award – The Globe by Brian Hooper Architect and m3architecture (architects in association) (Qld)
National Award – Sunshine Coast University Hospital by Architectus Brisbane and HDR Rice Daubney as Sunshine Coast Architects (Qld)
National Commendation – Act for Kids Child and Family Centre of Excellence by m3architecture (Qld)

 

Residential Architecture – Houses (Alterations & Additions)

The Eleanor Cullis-Hill Award – Captain Kelly’s Cottage by John Wardle Architects (Tas)
National Award – Annandale House by Welsh + Major Architects (NSW)
National Award – Burleigh Street House by ME (Qld)
National Award – Jac by panovscott (NSW)
National Commendation – Dornoch Terrace House by James Russell Architect (Qld)

 

Residential Architecture – Houses (New)

The Robin Boyd Award – Tamarama House by Durbach Block Jaggers Architects (NSW)
National Award – Cape Tribulation House by m3architecture (Qld)
National Award – Coogee House by Chenchow Little (NSW)
National Award – Mitti Street House by James Russell Architect (Qld)
National Commendation – Dark Horse by Architecture Architecture (Vic)
National Commendation – Rose House by Baracco+Wright Architects (Vic)

 

Residential Architecture – Multiple Housing

The Frederick Romberg Award – Tropology for DHA by Troppo Architects (NT)
National Award – Crown 515 by Smart Design Studio (NSW)
National Commendation – RMIT Bundoora West Student Accommodation by Richard Middleton Architects (RMA) (Vic)

 

Small Project Architecture

The Nicholas Murcutt Award – Lizard Log Amenities by CHROFI (NSW)
National Award – North Bondi Amenities by Sam Crawford Architects with Lymesmith (NSW)
National Commendation – The Piano Mill by Conrad Gargett (Qld)

 

Sustainable Architecture

The David Oppenheim Award – Central Park Sydney by Tzannes and Cox Richardson and Foster + Partners (NSW)
National Award – 88 Angel St by Steele Associates Architects (NSW)
National Commendation – Gen Y Demonstration Housing Project by David Barr Architect (WA)
National Commendation – Mt Alvernia College Anthony and La Verna Buildings by m3architecture (Qld)

 

Urban Design

The Walter Burley Griffin Award – Frank Bartlett Library and Moe Service Centre by fjmt (Vic)
National Award – The Goods Line by ASPECT Studios with CHROFI (NSW)

 

COLORBOND® Award for Steel Architecture

The COLORBOND® Award – Arts West, University of Melbourne by ARM + Architectus (Vic)

 

People’s Choice Award

Winner – Tent House by Sparks Architects (Qld)

 

 

2017 National Jury

Ken Maher (Chair) – Immediate Past President of the Australian Institute of Architects; Fellow, HASSELL; Honorary Professor, UNSW Sydney
Lawrence Nield – Northern Territory Government Architect; Professor of Architecture, University of Newcastle
Sue Dugdale – Director, Susan Dugdale and Associates
Peter Maddison – Director, Maddison Architects; Host, Grand Designs Australia
Melissa Bright – Founding Director, MAKE architecture

 

 

The 2017 National Architecture Awards are proudly supported by Principal Partner BlueScope; Major Partner Brickworks; Supporting Corporate Partners AWS, Bondor, Dulux and Smeg; Insurance Partner Planned Cover; and Media Partners Architecture Media and The Australian WISH.

Policy and Advocacy update

 

Nov 2017

The Institute is continuing to focus on delivering proactive and effective advocacy. We are working through the list of Institute policies that need updating, with ongoing consultation with members to ensure we are dealing with the issues that matter most to members and effectively communicating our messages to governments and the public. New policies can be developed at the instigation of the chapters, national committees and National Council.

Since our last update, we have also advocated at a national and local level on several issues:

 

NT

Darwin City Deal
The Northern Territory Government has entered into an agreement with the Commonwealth to work together to create a City Deal for Darwin. The NT Chapter recently provided a submission during the first phase of consultation, offering broad support for the vision to create a thriving city that defines business and growth in northern Australia. However, the chapter suggested the reconsideration of some aspects of the Master Plan’s transport vision to improve the city’s liveability.

 

Tasmania

Tasmanian Women’s Strategy
The Tasmanian Chapter’s Women in Architecture Group recently joined forces with the Tasmanian Chapter of the Australian Institute of Landscape Architects to provide a submission to the Tasmanian Women’s Strategy 2018 – 2020. The submission registered support for the strategy and said cultural change is needed to address inequality affecting women and girls in Tasmania. The two organisations urged the Tasmanian Government to play a lead role in making change and suggested both the establishment of a centralised government organisation to deal with these issues and a public education campaign.

Antarctic infrastructure
The Tasmanian Chapter provided a submission to the Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories inquiry into Australia’s infrastructure assets and capability in Antarctica. The chapter recommended a collaborative effort involving architects and engineers, to achieve cutting-edge design and construction methods and ensure laboratories and residences that can withstand the extreme conditions and provide the best planned and highest quality habitable environment possible for researchers and support staff.

Planning amendments
The Tasmanian Government’s move towards a statewide planning scheme continues, with the release of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Amendment (Major Projects) Bill 2017. The Tasmanian Chapter provided a submission, expressing support for the proposed measures, but arguing for a good design review within the assessment process, which adheres to good design principles, ensures the location, form and character of the development is addressed and promotes good design as integral to state identity. The submission also recommended the involvement of suitably qualified, interdisciplinary experts on the assessment panel, with architects and urban design specialists comprising a substantial part of the panel.

 

Voting now open for Australia’s favourite house

In celebration of World Architecture Day on Monday 2 October, voting has opened for the annual People’s Choice Award as part of the Australian Institute of Architects’ 2017 National Architecture Awards.

The People’s Choice Award gives members of the public the opportunity to select their favourite house from the 15 residential projects on the national jury’s shortlist.

Chosen from more than 250 entries, the homes showcase the best residential architecture – both new builds and alterations and additions – from around the country.

Voting is open until 5:00pm AEDST Friday 27 October. Some fantastic prizes, thanks to our Corporate Partners, are also up for grabs for those who vote in the People’s Choice Award and enter the competition by telling us in 25 words or less why their chosen project is their favourite.

The winning project will be revealed at the National Architecture Awards ceremony on Thursday 2 November at Albert Hall in Canberra along with all the winners as chosen by the expert panel of judges.

More information on the 2017 National Architecture Awards and access to voting in the People’s Choice Award is available via architecture.com.au/awards-2017

Projects in the running for the 2017 People’s Choice Award are:

Annandale House by Welsh + Major Architects (NSW)
Burleigh Street House by ME (Qld)
Captain Kelly’s Cottage by John Wardle Architects (Tas)
Cape Tribulation House by m3architecture (Qld)
Coogee House by Chenchow Little (NSW)
D’Entrecasteaux House by room11 (Tas)
Dark Horse by Architecture Architecture (Vic)
Dornoch Terrace House by James Russell Architect (Qld)
Jac by panovscott (NSW)
Little Sister’s House by Candalepas Associates (NSW)
Mitti Street House by James Russell Architect (Qld)
Rose House by Baracco+Wright Architects (Vic)
Sorrento House by Figureground Architecture (Vic)
Tamarama House by Durbach Block Jaggers Architects (NSW)
Tent House by Sparks Architects (Qld)

 

The Institute gratefully acknowledges the generous donation of prizes by Corporate Partners BlueScope, Dulux, AWS, Smeg and Architecture Media.

From the National President

Richard Kirk

National President, Richard Kirk. Photo by Toby Scott
 
 
Sept 2017 

UIA 2017 Seoul World Architects Congress
The Institute has a long and proud history of international engagement through active Memorandum of Understandings with the peak architecture bodies around the world and our membership with the International Union of Architects (UIA). I have just returned from the UIA’s 2017 Seoul World Architects Congress, a gathering of around 30,000 participants.

The UIA, like the Institute and many other peak professional bodies, has undergone a period of rejuvenation and re-alignment. This process will help position the UIA as an effective organisation in the promotion of architecture on a global scale, an activity that will benefit all member countries and provide a strong advocacy platform for our own agenda. Currently, there are 120 member nations and a vigorous plan to grow this in order to strengthen the power and influence of architects and the benefits of architecture globally.

Our continued involvement will enable the Institute to draw on the collective knowledge and work across a number of shared activities and policies and provide international benchmarks to further promote best-practice goals and facilitate international work opportunities for our members.

Personally, and on behalf of the Institute and our members, I would like to acknowledge and thank Peter Mould and Louise Cox as our representatives for their tireless efforts in supporting the UIA and positioning Australia as a leader through their participation in committees, development of policies and reviews.

 

Accreditation procedures
Following on from my last update regarding the Australian and New Zealand Architecture Program Accreditation Procedure (ANZ APAP) and our concerns raised during the recent review, I’m pleased to advise that our ongoing consultations with joint-owners AACA have progressed positively.

The Institute is a significant stakeholder and custodian in accreditation and has been instrumental in the development and delivery of the procedure since its inception and we will continue to champion international benchmarking and validation of the Australian architectural education and accreditation systems. The Institute and AACA have reached agreement on a future direction and more detailed advice will be issued to your shortly.

 

2017 National Architecture Awards
Two weeks ago the shortlist for the National Architecture Awards was revealed. I would like to offer my congratulations to all those who made the list. The 72 shortlisted projects are exemplars, demonstrating the essential and decisive role architects play in making our built environments enriching and sustainable.

As the culmination of a year-long program of rigorous judging by peers, the National Awards are the ultimate celebration of what our profession can achieve. Join us in Canberra on Thursday 2 November as we celebrate the winners of the 2017 National Awards.

 

Richard Kirk
National President

Policy & Advocacy Update

 

Sep 2017

The Institute is continuing to focus on delivering proactive and effective advocacy. We are working through the list of Institute policies that need updating, with ongoing consultation with members to ensure we are dealing with the issues that matter most to members and effectively communicating our messages to governments and the public. New policies can be developed at the instigation of the chapters, national committees and National Council.

Since our last update, we have also advocated at a national and local level on several issues:

 

NSW

Better Placed
The August launch of the NSW government design policy marks a turning point for the NSW built environment. Built around seven objectives, the Better Placed policy advocates the importance of good design in creating better places and spaces, supports industry and government to deliver good design and enables effective design processes to be established and supported in the planning system. Better Placed not only describes the design process itself; it will form part of the terms of reference supporting the delivery of design excellence processes, including design review panels and design excellence competitions. The NSW Chapter President Andrew Nimmo welcomed the release of the new policy, saying it will help to deliver a higher quality of new development and great places as we meet the challenges of an increasing population.

Parramatta North
The heritage precinct on the Parramatta River, northwest of the Parramatta CBD, includes some key colonial buildings: Cumberland Hospital, the former Female Factory (1821) and the Norma Parker Centre (1844). Most of the precinct is included in two separate listings on the State Heritage Register; an application has been made to the Commonwealth Government for national heritage listing. The precinct was rezoned two years ago to allow for future retail, commercial, recreation and community uses and the construction of 2700 dwellings. At the northern end of the site, 10-metre buildings will front the Parramatta River, with 21-metre buildings proposed for development lots to the east of the heritage precinct. The Institute’s NSW Chapter has provided a joint submission with the NSW Chapter of the Australian Institute of Landscape Architects responding to the development control plan and the initial development application. The submission emphasised the heritage significance of the precinct as a whole, arguing that future development of the site must, therefore, be based on the conservation, interpretation and enhancement of its heritage significance.

Wickham Master Plan
A draft master plan released by Newcastle City Council in March aims to build on the strategic shift of the commercial core of the city centre to Newcastle West. Wickham is evolving from a fringe semi-industrial area into a mixed-use urban neighbourhood with a new focus as the new Newcastle transport interchange.
In its submission, the NSW Chapter’s Newcastle Division recommended the preparation of a Newcastle-specific housing design guide to ensure a minimum consistent standard of housing design, saying the worst result would be a dense high-rise dormitory suburb. The submission also suggested that a Wickham Design Ideas Competition would encourage new ideas on the area’s design possibilities.

Powerhouse Museum
The NSW Government intends moving the Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences from its Sulman Medal-winning adaptive reuse of the 1899 Ultimo Power House to a new building on the banks of the Parramatta River. In a Sydney Morning Herald op-ed, the NSW Chapter President Andrew Nimmo proposed two arms of the museum. The Ultimo building would continue to display its impressive collection of engines, aeroplanes and vehicles, complemented by a new branch of the museum in Parramatta. The government’s business case for the move is expected at the end of the year. NSW Arts Minister Don Harwin has been considering a continuing cultural space in the Ultimo precinct.

 

Tasmania

Occupational Licensing
The Department of Justice in Tasmania is conducting a review of the occupational licensing system as it relates to building-related occupations. The Tasmanian Chapter provided a submission, recommending changes to the terminology associated with the building design profession. Within the Scheme for the Accreditation of Building Practitioners, buildings designers are currently described as ‘Building Designer – Architectural Restricted’, ‘Building Designer – Architectural Limited’ and ‘Building Designer – Architectural Domestic’. The chapter argued that these descriptions are confusing and contribute to giving the impression to consumers that building designers and architects are one and the same. The submission recommended a basic change to ‘Building Designer – Restricted’, ‘Building Designer – Limited’ and ‘Building Designer – Domestic’ to ensure clarity and certainty for the public that they are getting what they pay for.

 

Western Australia

South City Beach Kiosk
The Town of Cambridge in Western Australia recently conducted a survey on whether to demolish or retain the South City Beach Kiosk, designed in the 1970s by architect Tony Brand. The Western Australian Chapter has argued strongly for its retention, describing it as a quintessentially beachside brutalist gem and an important symbol of City Beach. The chapter suggested that the town could meet the $150,000 cost of repairs by offering it to a proponent rent-free in return for specified conservation works, until the cost of the works is amortised over an agreed period.

 

Support for Senate report’s strong recommendations on cladding

 

6 Sep, 2017

The Australian Institute of Architects fully supports all of the recommendations put forward by the Senate Economics References Committee inquiry into non-conforming building products in their interim report on aluminium composite cladding tabled today.

National President Richard Kirk said the Institute shares the Committee’s view that the use of non-conforming and non-compliant building products represents a very real and present threat to the community.
 
‘Ensuring public safety in the built environment is the chief priority of the architectural profession,’ Kirk said.

‘We support the Committee’s call for further urgent action to address the danger to our community posed by the de-professionalisation of building procurement over many years now.

‘As our cities become increasingly dense, and our buildings more complex, it is essential that those within industry become more – not less – skilled and qualified and their work subject to appropriately stringent checks and certification.

‘Architects already have, and maintain, a level of qualification, expertise and conduct codes of practice, as well as continuing professional development requirements, that exceed those of other professions within the building sector.

‘We believe the bar should be raised across the board with increased transparency and accountability for all participants throughout the vast and complex supply and construction chains.
 
‘The built environment is an area where regulation is not only appropriate but necessary. Cutting red tape cannot and should not come at the expense of people’s safety.

‘We want to see compliance and enforcement mechanisms strengthened across jurisdictions to properly protect all Australians in their homes, workplaces and in our public spaces.

‘As we have said, and the Committee has recommended, non-compliance must be punished with substantial fines and other penalties.’

 

Chief Executive Officer Jennifer Cunich said the Senate Committee had considered the evidence and recommended solutions the Institute had put forward.

‘The recommendations, if implemented, will go a long way to addressing many of the issues that architects have identified over an extended period,’ Cunich said.

‘We have called for improved measures to manage the risks posed by non-conforming and non-complying building products now and into the future.

‘Unlike other building practitioners, an architect who is a member of the Institute is professionally qualified with a minimum of five years’ study of an accredited university program, mandatory practical experience and a registration exam, legally registered to practice by State Registration Boards and bound by a code of conduct established by Institute.

‘We welcome the Committee’s adoption of our recommendation to establish a national licensing scheme, with requirements for continued professional development for all building practitioners.

‘The Institute has been supportive of the various measures being taken by State and Territory governments, as well as the work being coordinated by the Commonwealth through the Building Ministers Forum, but equally we have highlighted that there are some gaps and inconsistencies in the actions being taken by various jurisdictions that must be addressed.’

Member Advisory Alert – NCBPs and NCPs

Message from the National President

Richard Kirk

As specialist, highly-qualified, registered professionals, architects have specific obligations and duties when it comes to product specification and use in the built environment. Beyond the regulations imposed by government, the Institute’s members are also bound by a code of ethics, and by a duty to constantly improve our practices. This commitment to excellence underpins our social licence to operate and the trust our clients, and the broader community, place in the profession. 
 
Cognisant of these responsibilities, in the wake of the Grenfell fire tragedy in London and subsequent Australian federal, state and territory government actions in response, the Institute’s National Practice Committee has produced a new Advisory Note for members on non-conforming building products and non-complying products. 
 
We urge you to take the time to review this important information, which will shortly be followed by a Practice Note currently under development by the Acumen Content Review Panel. You can download the full Advisory Note here
 
All building work in Australia must meet certain performance and legal requirements to ensure it is safe, healthy and durable.  In recent years concerns have been raised about the risks of using non-conforming building products (NCBPs), or using non-complying products (NCPs). There are particular concerns around the health and safety risks associated with the use of NCBPs and NCPs.  With particular reference to flammable cladding, these represent a clear and unacceptable threat to public safety. This year’s Grenfell Tower fire tragedy in the UK showed the lethal risks of non-conforming products. 
 
Building audits currently underway by state and territory governments, including the one that commenced in Victoria following the 2014 Lacrosse fire, clearly demonstrate this is an issue – and a danger – we must urgently address in Australia. 
 
The Institute is engaging with government and advocating strongly for improved measures to manage the risks posed by NCBPs and NCPs now and into the future. 
 
We are urging decision makers to recognise the role architects are uniquely qualified and placed to play in ensuring better public safety in our built environment. 
 
We welcome the measures governments at all levels have taken to date acting to address the urgent public safety issue NCBPs and NCPs but more is needed. 
 
The Senate Standing Committee on Economics’ inquiry into non-conforming building products has held five public hearings this year and received 87 submissions – including ours which you can read here

Next Wednesday the Committee is due to release their Interim report on external cladding materials with the interim report on asbestos due for release in October and the final report on both in April next year. We will circulate the Committees’ interim report to members once it is released. 
 
Your Institute’s position
1.    The threat of non-conforming and non-compliant building products can be reduced at every stage of the supply and building process.
2.    Rigorous enforcement of existing laws, including more stringent examination of overseas certification and third-party evaluation of locally produced materials, can ensure that a product is what it is represented to be, with consistent performance.   
3.    Traditionally, architects were the final arbiters of material selection. Decisions are now made by builders, project managers, and others to substitute products to save costs, with the decision being based on materials that ‘look the same’ rather than ‘perform the same’ as that originally selected by the architect designer.
4.    With reduced levels of oversight by skilled and experienced practitioners, inappropriate use and substitution of building products can result in low quality and often dangerous buildings.
5.    The Institute will push to realign decision making responsibilities with expertise. We will push for stringent enforcement of the building code and proper oversight. We will closely monitor government action and reforms to ensure our members are well informed. 
 
Together, we will continue to advocate for high quality, safe and durable buildings to our community that architects are well-placed to deliver.
 

Richard Kirk,
National President,
Australian Institute of Architects
 

Photo credit:  Toby Scott